Star Trek writers have fun with the technology in their universe. CGP gray takes a look at some of the issues that transporters bring to the table.
Progressive Bloggers
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- B.C. wildfire evacuees say they are being asked to leave hotels
- Destroying Michael Cohen: Trump team sets off on mission at trial
- 'There’s no food.... There’s no life,' say Palestinians in Khan Younis
- Miniature poodle Sage wins best in show at Westminster Kennel Club dog show
- Bouchard scores late as Oilers even series with 3-2 win over Canucks
- Alice Munro, Canadian author who mastered the short story, dead at 92
- Teaching has changed a lot in Marlene Mutch's 63-year career. For example? She no longer stables horses
- Stepped-up Russian attacks on Kharkiv a problem that Kyiv cannot ignore
- Despite extensive DNA tests, identity of 1 of Winnipeg serial killer's victims remains a mystery, trial hears
- Federal tests find no signs of bird flu virus in Canadian retail milk
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
3 comments
March 16, 2016 at 7:33 am
john zande
We need Jonathan Livingston Seagull technology… just know you’re already there.
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2016 at 2:58 pm
The Arbourist
@JZ
That takes a lot of the fun out it, don’t you think? I mean your suggestin would mean that refribulating the tachyon matrix and other stuff would be completely unnecessary.
Future ST episodes would be shorter by half if we couldn’t future speak about the transporters. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 17, 2016 at 9:39 pm
bleatmop
This just made Star Trek a lot more badass!
LikeLiked by 1 person