You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Fail’ tag.

fallHi everybody, just a random update from your friendly Intransigent blogger, to lighten the mood around here.  I have a tale of a happy convergence of circumstances. 

One day, I’m at the horse rescue and another volunteer invites me to come to a different horse-establishment to meet her horse.  Of course I said yes!  So we made a date, and I met up with her and her horse, and as we’re fussing over her horse and giving him treats, she asks me, have you ever thought of starting to ride again.  I (as cheerfully as I can manage) say “nope, I’m too fat.”

We carry on pampering her horse, and the owner of the barn stops by to chat.  “So,” she asks, quite innocently like there was no ulterior motive in getting me to visit, “Have you ever considered starting to ride again?”

I do my little nope too fat, shrug, self-deprecating laugh thing.

The barn owner looks me up and down, and says, “We have a couple lesson horses who could handle youno problem. Email me if you’d like to have a lesson sometime!”

I emailed her as soon as I got home, and lessons started the week after singing lessons ended for the summer!

A few observations upon getting back in the saddle after eighteen years on the ground:

  • Everything is still there mentally, but the balance and fitness to do what I remember, has left the building
  • Riding, especially posting trot, is way more exercise than I remember
  • Horses are still very silly, unpredictable animals
  • Falling off hurts about the same amount as ever

 

 

Good morning.  Today’s disservice, with many thanks to AntiCitizen-X,  is on the short and sweet side as cracking this particular religious chestnut is neither particularly complex or time consuming.  Necessary?  Of course, but hey on the Canadian long weekend everyone gets a brain break. :)

Enjoy.

 

 

[Edit: Grr. - What I get for not previewing my post.  This is the correct video, Dr.Oz is scheduled later in the week.]

[Edit #2: Adding the syllogism for sake of clarity.]

 

1. God is omnipotent (definition of God).
2. Omnipotence is the power to do all that is logically possible.
3. A logically possible feat is any coherent action one can speak out loud without contradiction (definition of logical possibility)
3a. Any feat that has ever been done before is logically possible.
4. It is logically possible to create a finite mass of rock that cannot be lifted by its own maker.
5. Therefore, an omnipotent being can create a finite mass of rock that cannot be lifted by its own maker.
6. Therefore, an omnipotent being can create a finite mass of rock that cannot be lifted by an omnipotent being (definition of “maker” by an omnipotent being).
7. For any finite mass of rock, it is logically possible to generate a force that will lift it against a uniform gravitational field. (Newton’s 2nd Law of Motion)
8. Therefore, an omnipotent being can lift any finite mass of rock. (from #2 and #7)
9. Premise #6 and premise #8 are contradictions.
10. Therefore, it is logically impossible to be omnipotent (from #3 and #8)
11. Therefore, God is logically impossible.

 

 

Olympicfail   The very notion that we are spending money on an assortment of rubber disk chasers, gravity assisted sled-fanatics and dancers-on-frozen water angers me.   What infuriates me is the notion that throwing money at this motley crew will somehow enhance Canada’s standing as a nation and that “owning the podium” will bring us international regard.

What a pile of feel good nationalistic hoo-haa.

Canada should be spending its money on improving the living conditions of its people.  When our First Nations have a safe and clean water supply our international standing will grow.  When our homeless do not freeze to death in the streets our international standing will rise.  When we eliminate child poverty our standing will increase.

Spending money to win a shiny metal disk for a 7 second soundbite on the world stage is not only stupid, it is irresponsible.

 

***TW – Extreme Incompetence ***

 

The Canadian Air Transport Security Authority are on eternally vigilant for dread items such as this:

220px-Fingernail_Clippers

or this:

liquidsandgels

Obviously items depicted above are a clear and present danger to yourself, your fellow passengers, the airplane, and Western Civilization(!).  Trying to get either types of these items past airport security gets you this:

Rage

YOU SHALL NOT PASS !!!

Recently though, at the Edmonton International Airport someone decided to bring another item in carry on luggage.  It looked like this:

 

This is the very security photo from the Edmonton Airport.  Observe cylindrical object on left.

This is the security photo from the Edmonton Airport. Observe cylindrical object on left.

Let’s get another view of said item.

Hmmm.  Smells like a pipe bomb to me.

Hmmm. Smells like a pipe bomb to me.

Our intrepid CATSA security screeners responded like this:

CATSA AGENT - Lol Whut?  It's only a pipe bomb.  Carry on with your flight sir, oh AND DID YOU WANT YOUR PIPE BOMB BACK?

CATSA AGENT – Lol Whut? It’s only a pipe bomb. Carry on with your flight sir, oh AND DID YOU WANT YOUR PIPE BOMB BACK?

Thankfully, the passenger in question, did not want his pipe bomb back and insisted, to the properly mollified airport screeners, that the pipe bomb should remain in the hands of airport security.  Our watchful guardians then sat on the pipe bomb for four days before they notified the police (RCMP).

This story broke and everyone who has heard it since has been like this:

WHAT THE F*CK?

WHAT THE F*CK?

 

I have nothing really more to say on the subject as my mind is blown.  If you’d like the full story, please see these three CBC articles linked below detailing how a dude brought a pipe bomb to the Edmonton Airport, got caught in airport security, had security GIVE THE PIPE BOMB BACK, and then have him insist they take it, and then board his flight despite having  brought a bomb in his carry-on luggage

I heard he had a great vacation.

CBC News Article 1

CBC News Article 2

CBC News Article 3

 

 

 

Have you ever run up against a fine deluded individual who, in their desperation to ‘prove’ their grand ooga-booga exists, busts out the Ontological argument? It sucks, as the OA relies a lot on the more informal rhetorical process known as BBB or bullshit baffles brains. Let’s travel with AntiCitizenX as he unwends the spoor of the deluded and demonstrates how thin a claim the OA actually is.

Hymns suck. And I don’t just mean in moral or rational sense, though they definitely suck in those areas as well. I mean musically. They are absolutely wretched. As a fledgeling choral singer, I’m aware of some wonderfully fantastic religious based pieces that are beautiful to listen to and sing, filled with ludicrous immorality though they may be. But those pieces aren’t for the congregation. They are much to difficult and stimulating. No. The order of the day is simplicity and monotony to lull the brain to sleep, priming it for whatever indoctrinated message pasted nakedly across the song. Repetitive droning is key to drilling ugly ideas into the poor minds of parishioners. Of course, if you don’t buy into the B.S, then all you get is a hellishly dull experience that you wouldn’t call ‘music’ even at your most cynical.

If you haven’t checked out the godless comedy of Mitchell and Webb yet, I highly recommend you do so. Today’s viewing, from Series 4:Episode 3, according to David of Mitchell, presents a satirical look at not only the plodding tediousness  of hymns, but also the inherent offensiveness of religion, no matter how happy a face they try to draw on it.

In our name, let us mock.

libertarian bs 01   The uniquely toxic form of libertarianism in the US and is a symptom of private power and influence run amok.

This is just a snippet of the interview with Noam Chomsky, I recommend you go read the entire article on Alternet.

Wilson: Why should we choose anarchy, as opposed to, say, libertarianism?

Chomsky:Well what’s called libertarian in the United States, which is a special U. S. phenomenon, it doesn’t really exist anywhere else — a little bit in England — permits a very high level of authority and domination but in the hands of private power:  so private power should be unleashed to do whatever it likes.  The assumption is that by some kind of magic, concentrated private power will lead to a more free and just society.  Actually that has been believed in the past.  Adam Smith for example, one of his main arguments for markets was the claim that under conditions of perfect liberty, markets would lead to perfect equality.  Well, we don’t have to talk about that!  That kind of —

Wilson:  It seems to be a continuing contention today …

Chomsky: Yes, and so well that kind of libertarianism, in my view, in the current world, is just a call for some of the worst kinds of tyranny, namely unaccountable private tyranny.  Anarchism is quite different from that.  It calls for an elimination to tyranny, all kinds of tyranny.  Including the kind of tyranny that’s internal to private power concentrations.  So why should we prefer it?  Well I think because freedom is better than subordination.  It’s better to be free than to be a slave.  Its’ better to be able to make your own decisions than to have someone else make decisions and force you to observe them.  I mean, I don’t think you really need an argument for that.  It seems like … transparent.

The thing you need an argument for, and should give an argument for, is, How can we best proceed in that direction?  And there are lots of ways within the current society.  One way, incidentally,  is through use of the state, to the extent that it is democratically controlled.  I mean in the long run, anarchists would like to see the state eliminated.  But it exists, alongside of private power, and the state is, at least to a certain extent, under public influence and control — could be much more so.  And it provides devices to constrain the much more dangerous forces of private power.  Rules for safety and health in the workplace for example.  Or insuring  that people have decent health care, let’s say.  Many other things like that.  They’re not going to come about through private power.  Quite the contrary.  But they can come about through the use of the state system under limited democratic control … to carry forward reformist measures.  I think those are fine things to do. they should be looking forward to something much more, much beyond, — namely actual, much larger-scale democratization.  And that’s possible to not only think about, but to work on.  So one of the leading anarchist thinkers, Bakunin in the 19th cent, pointed out that it’s quite possible to build the institutions of a future society within the present one.

This Blog best viewed with Ad-Block and Firefox!

What is ad block? It is an application that, at your discretion blocks out advertising so you can browse the internet for content as opposed to ads. If you do not have it, get it here so you can enjoy my blog without the insidious advertising.

Like Privacy?

Change your Browser to Duck Duck Go.

Share this Blog

Bookmark and Share

Contact Info

Need to send me email? I have a infrequently monitored email account. Reach me at : arbourist at outlook dot com.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 208 other followers

Progressive Bloggers

Atheism Plus

Categories

August 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives

Blogs I Follow

joannevalentinesimson

On Being a Woman

darkhorseswore

capturing the manosphere in senses

Your social constructs are showing

Prose, atheism, radical feminism, Big Brother and social justice

Gender Identity Watch

Watching Legal Developments That Erase Female Reality

mirabile dictu

Feminism, Poetry, Images, Politics

Anti-Imperialism.com

News, Analysis, Culture

Pearls Before Swine

The Blog O' Stephan Pastis

roughseasinthemed

just another roughseas blog about life in Gib and Spain

Bitethehand - the real Untrusted?

How the CiF rebels turned hypocrisy into an art form

femininefeministe

"The first problem, for men and women, is not to learn, but to unlearn." -Gloria Steinem

CHAPTER 20.

Rhythmatic Explosions

notyourfeminazi

Welcome to my soapbox. Check your privilege at the door.

CEREBRATION

Reflections of a deeper psyche!

The Prime Directive

"No future triumph or metamorphosis can justify the pitiful blighting of a human being against his will." Peter Zapffe

Sniping In Heels

Thoughts on all things geeky or feminist. Mostly things that are both.

welcome to paradox

amateur poetry and prose. i don't bite, i stab.

Out From Under the Umbrella

playing in the rain

Victoria N℮ür☼N☮☂℮ṧ

Life, Synaptic Pruning, and the Pursuit of Happiness

emilymacarthur

Organized chaos.

Leanne's Little World

Serving up a nice cup of equali-tea!

she thinks. she says. she writes.

Geek Feminism Blog

Women, feminism, and geek culture

Enquiries on Atheism

αθεος και ευτυχισμενος

Bread and Roses

Musings on feminism and LGBTQ rights from a straight male.

Class Warfare Blog

I don’t want to start a class war; it started a long time ago and, unfortunately, we are losing.

phonaesthetica

Keeping the beast in the sock drawer since 1974.

Sex matters.

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

The Arctic Feminist

the blogging of terri strange

thepoliticalvagina

Social Commentary, Activism, Humanism

Humorless Cunts

Media That Won't Make You Rampage

Deep Green Resistance News Service

Strategic environmental activism

Experiential Pagan

A panentheistic shamanistic sceptic with attacks of mystical significance.

No Fly on the WALL.

Not just another Feminist blog. || There is Feminism... and then there are Feminisms. || For those who are fly, and those who soar. || No flies are on this wall.

Feminasana

yoga + yarn + feminism

A Point of Contention

"To argue with a man who has renounced reason is like administering medicine to the dead" -Thomas Paine

resist-o-feed

relevant to your interests

The Belle Jar

"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath

Believers vs Non-Believers

Religious Debates with Atheists vs Theists in PalTalk.com

FeminGenUality

Where feminism, gender and sexuality duke it out

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers

%d bloggers like this: