You are currently browsing the monthly archive for February 2012.

Well, isn’t this just revolting.  :)

Today we are taking part in one of the cornerstones of Patriarchal oppression.  *Cheer!* *huzzah! * Yes, dear readers, we are getting married.  This occasion will be an informal,  small family affair, the essentially just the paperwork, so we can be married on a unique day.   The ‘grand’ reception is to be scheduled later in the year when there is less snow and more mosquitoes.   Well, there is Marriage Commissioner, a pen, and a life filled with happy marital bliss that need be dealt with, so I must go.

Other than that, Happy Leap Year/day/thingie!

The Arbourist.

Oh ya, and how I’m feeling….see below:

Seeing history from a different perspective is often an enlightening experience.  Noam Chomsky is a excellent guide to a historical narrative that makes sense and fits the facts of the situation, as opposed to what we are told by approved sources.  It is a long read,  somehow sadly classified as a radical perspective, but well worth your time.  The media in the US often do not publish Chomsky’s work despite its accuracy and veracity, because publishing it might actually stir public opinion and motivate people to get involved with their government.  It is left to alternative media organizations and Al Jazeera to find insight on how the world really works without the usual mainstream blinders.

“Significant anniversaries are solemnly commemorated – Japan’s attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, for example. Others are ignored, and we can often learn valuable lessons from them about what is likely to lie ahead. Right now, in fact.

At the moment, we are failing to commemorate the 50th anniversary of President John F Kennedy’s decision to launch the most destructive and murderous act of aggression of the post-World War II period: the invasion of South Vietnam, later all of Indochina, leaving millions dead and four countries devastated, with casualties still mounting from the long-term effects of drenching South Vietnam with some of the most lethal carcinogens known, undertaken to destroy ground cover and food crops.

The prime target was South Vietnam. The aggression later spread to the North, then to the remote peasant society of northern Laos, and finally to rural Cambodia, which was bombed at the stunning level of all allied air operations in the Pacific region during World War II, including the two atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In this, Henry Kissinger’s orders were being carried out – “anything that flies on anything that moves” – a call for genocide that is rare in the historical record. Little of this is remembered. Most was scarcely known beyond narrow circles of activists.

When the invasion was launched 50 years ago, concern was so slight that there were few efforts at justification, hardly more than the president’s impassioned plea that “we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence” and if the conspiracy achieves its ends in Laos and Vietnam, “the gates will be opened wide”.

Elsewhere, he warned further that “the complacent, the self-indulgent, the soft societies are about to be swept away with the debris of history [and] only the strong… can possibly survive”, in this case reflecting on the failure of US aggression and terror to crush Cuban independence.

By the time protest began to mount half a dozen years later, the respected Vietnam specialist and military historian Bernard Fall, no dove, forecast that “Vietnam as a cultural and historic entity… is threatened with extinction…[as]…the countryside literally dies under the blows of the largest military machine ever unleashed on an area of this size”. He was again referring to South Vietnam.

When the war ended eight horrendous years later, mainstream opinion was divided between those who described the war as a “noble cause” that could have been won with more dedication, and at the opposite extreme, the critics, to whom it was “a mistake” that proved too costly. By 1977, President Carter aroused little notice when he explained that we owe Vietnam “no debt” because “the destruction was mutual”.

There are important lessons in all this for today, even apart from another reminder that only the weak and defeated are called to account for their crimes. One lesson is that to understand what is happening we should attend not only to critical events of the real world, often dismissed from history, but also to what leaders and elite opinion believe, however tinged with fantasy. Another lesson is that alongside the flights of fancy concocted to terrify and mobilise the public (and perhaps believed by some who are trapped in their own rhetoric), there is also geostrategic planning based on principles that are rational and stable over long periods because they are rooted in stable institutions and their concerns. That is true in the case of Vietnam as well. I will return to that, only stressing here that the persistent factors in state action are generally well concealed.

The Iraq war is an instructive case. It was marketed to a terrified public on the usual grounds of self-defense against an awesome threat to survival: the “single question”, George W Bush and Tony Blair declared, was whether Saddam Hussein would end his programs of developing weapons of mass destruction. When the single question received the wrong answer, government rhetoric shifted effortlessly to our “yearning for democracy”, and educated opinion duly followed course; all routine.

Later, as the scale of the US defeat in Iraq was becoming difficult to suppress, the government quietly conceded what had been clear all along. In 2007-2008, the administration officially announced that a final settlement must grant the US military bases and the right of combat operations, and must privilege US investors in the rich energy system – demands later reluctantly abandoned in the face of Iraqi resistance. And all well kept from the general population.

Gauging American decline

Read the rest of this entry »

  Poking wasps nests with  chopsticks seems to be the motive behind much of US foreign policy.  The cesspool that is Afghanistan needs only a couple of gentle stirs to spray its fetid lunacy and violence on everything and everyone.  Case in point, burning paper turns the people bug-frack crazy:

 “Afghan officials say at least two demonstrators have been killed in northern Afghanistan as protests over last week’s burning of Qur’ans turned violent.

It marked the sixth day of deadly protests over the burning of Qur’ans and other religious materials at a U.S. base. The White House has called the incident a mistake and apologized to the Afghan government but demonstrations have continued.”

The US relationship with Afghanistan seems to be suffering multiple personality disorder.  Drone attacks that butcher civilians get little mention, but burning the Koran gets an official apology?  It makes no sense.  You don’t do PR in an occupied country, you just get the job done because by now any notion of good intent or nation building is long gone.  All that remains is the national interest, the more discretely it is handled the better.

“The administrator of Iman Sahib district in Kunduz province says Sunday’s protest turned violent as demonstrators tried to enter the district’s largest city.  He says people in the crowd fired on police and threw grenades at a U.S. base nearby.  NATO said initial reports indicated no international service members were killed.”

Ignorant people with access to small arms and explosives, how could anything go wrong?

“A gunman killed two U.S. military advisers with shots to the back of the head Saturday inside a heavily guarded ministry building in Kabul, and NATO ordered military workers out of Afghan ministries as protests raged for a fifth day over the burning of Qur’ans at a U.S. army base.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack at the Interior Ministry, saying it was retaliation for the Qur’an burnings, after the two U.S. servicemen — a lieutenant-colonel and a major — were found dead on their office floor, Afghan and western officials said.”

Whoops.  Underestimating the resolve of your enemy is always a recipe for trouble.  U.S/NATO forces will be forced to reevaluate their security procedures after this incident.

“The two American service members were found by another foreigner who went into the room, which is only accessible by people who know the correct numerical combination, according to the Afghan official, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to disclose details about the shootings.

They were shot in the back of the head, according to Western officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose the information. Authorities were poring over security camera video for clues, the Afghan official said.”

I wonder if the American Administration is getting the message?  The slow-motion withdrawal is only going to cost more lives.  Admit defeat, and get on with the program already, there are others in line just waiting to be invaded and oppressed.

 

     You would think that for one week, just one week, I could skip the DWR Sunday Disservice.  I’d be happy to say, “Oh hey, the religious have not done anything horribly immoral or unethical,this is a good week.”

Not gonna frakin’ happen.

This amazingly batshite nutbuttery slice of  insipid religion retardation hails from the not so great state of Tennessee.  The dubiously named Family Action Council is pushing for legislation that would allow students to criticize (read bully) homosexuals  in school without sanction.  The story is dated, but first time I’ve seen it and of course, it pisses me off that christians try and pull stupid shite like this.

The bill has not yet passed, and hopefully someone who is sane will stop this ugly freight train of hate before it gathers any more momentum.

 

 

 

Sean makes some great points, let me reiterate them.  Why are parents allowed to watch their child die because they believe in magic?  Christian Science and faith healing are utter bullshite and yet they continue to torture children, often to death, because of their mysticism.  The Christian Right then gets a seismic stiffy over universal healthcare and the fatuous notion of death panels, while they say NOTHING about those who choose to let their children die from treatable ailments.  Where is the outcry from the religious pro-lifers?  Oh well it doesn’t involve stripping away female bodily autonomy and it is murder in a religiously approved away so it must not count.

Frak Off.

The hypocrisy of the religious right is appalling.  They should never be regarded as a source of moral guidance on any issue, ever.

 

Often here at DWR CMI Fridays we see the classics being performed by serious musicians doing serious things and it is majestic and wonderful, but it’s not all there is.  Far from it.  Steven Sharp Nelson, a cellist and member of the Piano Guys represents, for me, what being a musician is all about.  He is living completely in the moment, through his 10,000+ hours of practice he allows himself to be;  simply –  just there, a conduit for the music he creates.  The energy and emotion expressed is amazing, you can take a small part of his quiet mastery and bring it inside yourself and let the music, the joy of creating, the joy of sharing encompasses you.

This video should be a part of every music curriculum.  It lends inspiration, hope and wonder.   Keep in mind this is a youth orchestra backing him up, 13 – 18 years old, making and contributing to brilliant music.  If they can do it, so can we.

Don’t only practice your art,

But force your way into its secrets,

For it and knowledge can raise man to the Divine.

-Ludwig Van Beethoven

*There are 5 motifs from Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony in this piece, can you parse them out?*

Even Jebus thinks you are bug-frak crazy.

Christianity is the religion that keeps on giving.  By “giving” I mean keeps on festering. Christianity exudes an oozing rancid pus that encrapulates and taints those exposed to its toxic effects. Dogmatic religious beliefs, like those espoused by Christian Patriarchy, are the putrefying ichor that rots modern secular society.

Pleasantries aside, this is probably one of the worst things you will read all day.  I’m going to re-post a article from No Longer Quivering about Matt, a young patriarch in training, and his thoughts on the role of women in a traditional christian family.  Trigger warnings for domestic violence, misogyny and homophobia are mandated for such piece.

The Red Pen O’ Snarky-Justice is raising an uproar that cannot be quelled, and thus, my commentary shall appear in red italics lightly treading on the wide trail of fail Matt leaves behind him.

“It’s possible that Matt is a troll and his comments should be ignored or deleted – but his arguments are not at all unlike the “biblical” beliefs which I heard taught/preached regularly during my Quiverfull days. I am assuming Matt is a young man based on his immaturity and know-it-all attitude – of course, given that patriarchs rarely grow up, it’s possible that he is an old man – maybe he’s the pastor of an IFB church.

So, without further ado – here’s Matt:
“I take it from your post that you are dead set on fornicating, although the Bible tells you not to do that.

“Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. [and the bible, like all religious delusional nonsense, is full of shite]

“Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.[Ownership of one human being by another is a fracking aberration. Claiming that it is endorsed in holy scripture doubles down on the bullshite and vile misogyny omnipresent in the bible.]

“This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.[translation: Smile while you take your abuse as the bible says its okay, hell, you should be thanking me for letting you fully enjoy your noble roles as incubator, house slave and fuck-toilet]”

You are mistaking voluntary submission with involuntary servitude. As a Christian lady you are commanded to be subject to your husband, it is asked of you to submit. It doesn’t say “men, oppress your woman to all costs!”[I command you to voluntarily submit - this like most christian apologia has a sickening circularity along with a dash of guilt - witness the next sentence]. As a Christian woman who claims to believe in the Word of God, which is inspired/breathed by God, your Creator, is it alright for you to dismiss what that Word says? [Because god is such a fair (ordering genocide) and noble (endorsing slavery) creature, we should trust this derranged lunatics words to the letter - you want to be a properly deluded christian right?]

Matt, if if smells like BS...

A woman surrenders to a man so easily when he takes charge [Being afraid of being beaten to death will do that]. That is the danger of having a matriarch with a man in subjection. The woman indeed is the weaker vessel, tossed to and fro, giving in to whims, and judges things according to her motherly instinct [**swoosh!!**  Wow, did you hear that it was sound of women being dismissed as fully autonomous human beings possessing all the rights and freedoms men have, embrace being a second class 'semi-person' ; it can be fun because possessing as lady brain automatically makes you retarded] For instance, she would say sodomite couplings are lovely, because love is blind [Funny how woman = love = stupid]. A man who is not of God would say “I don’t care, to each their own”, but not mention love in the equation. 

A man of God would not even let a sodomite in under his roof or in the vincinity of his children!![Except in church, because being buggered as an alter boy is a holy experience, praise the lard for that!] Let me tell you something, love is not blind![Wait, didn't you just say it was like a sentence ago?] Even infatuation is not blind. But infatuation and love are two different things. Love is a choice. Hate is a choice [Word Salad is a Choice!]. I will hate the wicked and their deeds [some dude was saying something about turning the other cheek - ya know tolerance and stuff, but I digress, religious are fundamentally intolerant and Matt is doing just a spiffy-awesome job at being a douche-nozzle for jebus at the moment] Yes, hate.

Furthermore, sodomites hate God, and infiltrate churches to spit in God’s face [projection much?]. You might say, “sodomites love each other, so what’s wrong with that”? I love my siblings, does that mean I have sexual relations with them?![ah, the gentle conflation of incest with same sex relations *sigh*] I love men, as brothers. I love women, as sisters. But by God, there is only one person I take sexual pleasure in[mentioning the palm sisters in a godly rant, Matt really is all over the place on this one...]! Love is not sex. Learn it, woman.

So, if you’re a Christian woman, your God that you supposedly love, tells you to submit and be in subject to your husband in every thing[huh, god was a misogynist asshat too, colour me shocked]. Am I a jealous man? Every man of God should be jealous! Just as God is jealous, and wants us only to worship him[my goodness you are a special snowflake aren't you cupcake, you get to be a jealous abuser because god says so, convenient].

And why am I jealous? Because the woman is the weaker vessel[citation needed, and 'god says so' is his magic book does not count], and evil men who have acknowledged this takes advantage, to defile you [because explicitly calling women inferior and infantilizing them isn't defiling them at all].

“This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.[whoa shields up! Unfounded pontificating incoming!] For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth [I'm going to assume that Douche-twaddle is referring to men that are not patriarchal misogynists who don't actually want to enslave women].”

I’m telling you, there’s a lot of weak vessels, silly women, out there, who ungodly men lie in wait for. Am I controlling for keeping my woman away from these evil men? Then so be it. Yes, I am in control, but I love my woman enough to grant her freedom of thought and expression[as long as it completely agrees with my frakked up shite filled point of view; there fixed for ya]. She is as intelligent as I am, but still the weaker vessel, due to her willingness to surrender and submit to a man who takes charge [so she's evil if she does not submit and then she is also evil because she does submit, this like the rest of your circular bullcookery is half-baked, nutty-rotten religious hatred of women].

Matt says pretty fracked-up-shite here and needs a photo to break the wall of text and add luminosity to Matt's solemn pronouncements.

Ask yourself, how many men adopt the interests and beliefs of their wives [just the ones that care about their partners thoughts and feelings and want to share as opposed to dominate their lives]? None. How many women adopts the interests and beliefs of their husbands? They are in abundance[because you beat the ones that don't submit, you dastardly fuck]. It is clear that a woman submits to a man who rules her, even to the point of abuse, I’m sad to say[the christian Dark Ages are calling, they miss you]. Therefore a Christian man is told to love his woman as himself. What man would abuse himself[most patriarchs don't; they save the beatings and abuse for their wife and children, duh?]? He may abuse drugs or alcohol but not himself.”

 
Wow.  Deep-breath….*whew*.  You’ll need a shower after immersing yourself in the rectum-orious musings of ass-spittle like Matt.  Religion is an ugly piece of work and of course as mentioned around here from time to time, rotten to the core.  The sheer amount of hate for women turns ones guts sour.

Christian patriarchy, like all fundamentalist wack-a-loon religious fappery, is fundamentally anti-woman, anti-child and anti-modern (anti-civilization, while we are at it) paternalistic bullshite.  This branch of the christian death-cult ranks up there with the crazy Muslim sects that demand the burka and female genital mutilation from their woman-folk (cultural artifacts/religiously backed…your choice, it is still patently wrong).

How we let the religiously sponsored abuse of Women continue to exist in the so called civilized West is beyond me.

This Blog best viewed with Ad-Block and Firefox!

What is ad block? It is an application that, at your discretion blocks out advertising so you can browse the internet for content as opposed to ads. If you do not have it, get it here so you can enjoy my blog without the insidious advertising.

Like Privacy?

Change your Browser to Duck Duck Go.

Share this Blog

Bookmark and Share

Contact Info

Need to send me email? I have a infrequently monitored email account. Reach me at : arbourist at outlook dot com.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 208 other followers

Progressive Bloggers

Atheism Plus

Categories

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Archives

Blogs I Follow

joannevalentinesimson

On Being a Woman

darkhorseswore

capturing the manosphere in senses

Your social constructs are showing

Prose, atheism, radical feminism, Big Brother and social justice

Gender Identity Watch

Watching Legal Developments That Erase Female Reality

mirabile dictu

Feminism, Poetry, Images, Politics

Anti-Imperialism.com

News, Analysis, Culture

Pearls Before Swine

The Blog O' Stephan Pastis

roughseasinthemed

just another roughseas blog about life in Gib and Spain

Bitethehand - the real Untrusted?

How the CiF rebels turned hypocrisy into an art form

femininefeministe

"The first problem, for men and women, is not to learn, but to unlearn." -Gloria Steinem

CHAPTER 20.

Rhythmatic Explosions

notyourfeminazi

Welcome to my soapbox. Check your privilege at the door.

CEREBRATION

Reflections of a deeper psyche!

The Prime Directive

"No future triumph or metamorphosis can justify the pitiful blighting of a human being against his will." Peter Zapffe

Sniping In Heels

Thoughts on all things geeky or feminist. Mostly things that are both.

welcome to paradox

amateur poetry and prose. i don't bite, i stab.

Out From Under the Umbrella

playing in the rain

Victoria N℮ür☼N☮☂℮ṧ

Life, Synaptic Pruning, and the Pursuit of Happiness

emilymacarthur

Organized chaos.

Leanne's Little World

Serving up a nice cup of equali-tea!

she thinks. she says. she writes.

Geek Feminism Blog

Women, feminism, and geek culture

Enquiries on Atheism

αθεος και ευτυχισμενος

Bread and Roses

Musings on feminism and LGBTQ rights from a straight male.

Class Warfare Blog

I don’t want to start a class war; it started a long time ago and, unfortunately, we are losing.

phonaesthetica

Keeping the beast in the sock drawer since 1974.

Sex matters.

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

The Arctic Feminist

the blogging of terri strange

thepoliticalvagina

Social Commentary, Activism, Humanism

Humorless Cunts

Media That Won't Make You Rampage

Deep Green Resistance News Service

Strategic environmental activism

Experiential Pagan

A panentheistic shamanistic sceptic with attacks of mystical significance.

No Fly on the WALL.

Not just another Feminist blog. || There is Feminism... and then there are Feminisms. || For those who are fly, and those who soar. || No flies are on this wall.

Feminasana

yoga + yarn + feminism

A Point of Contention

"To argue with a man who has renounced reason is like administering medicine to the dead" -Thomas Paine

resist-o-feed

relevant to your interests

The Belle Jar

"Let me live, love and say it well in good sentences." - Sylvia Plath

Believers vs Non-Believers

Religious Debates with Atheists vs Theists in PalTalk.com

FeminGenUality

Where feminism, gender and sexuality duke it out

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 208 other followers

%d bloggers like this: